Here's the thing: symbols in education, especially English-based ones, can shape how we understand various concepts. Many people ask how this affects learning across different languages and cultures. For instance, in math and science, equations like F=ma are often universally taught in English, which can create a sort of English-centric educational framework. This means students who encounter these symbols in their native languages might find themselves at a disadvantage, not because they lack understanding, but because the symbols and terminology can feel foreign or confusing [21]. Interestingly enough, research shows that when students engage with symbols in their native language, they often demonstrate a deeper understanding of the material. It’s like having a cozy chat with a friend rather than trying to decipher a complex textbook. This isn’t just a minor detail; it’s a significant factor in how well students grasp complex ideas [21]. So, when schools prioritize English symbols, they might unintentionally alienate non-native speakers or those who are less familiar with the symbols used in English. Let me break this down further: while English symbols are essential for global communication, they can also perpetuate educational inequalities. Students from different backgrounds might struggle with concepts simply because of the language barrier. In my research, I found that localized symbols could enhance engagement and comprehension, making learning more inclusive [21]. The bottom line is that education should aim to bridge these gaps, not widen them.